The P10 can only do worse... now thru next 2 yrs is what matters
for the newB12 vs P10.
Thus... Do you believe the newP10 can compete w/, offer more stability (less risk), offer higher rankings, earn more $$$'s and manage the UCB/ASU/UA/UU group better than the newB12 ??? If so, you're logical is flawed.
To the B12's issues u mentioned -- they all stemmed from U of Toxic. And any conference that has UT is doomed to lose partners (or to kick UT out)... thus the B12 losses of Neb, TAM, UCB, Mizzou & now OU (who are fools for following UT anywhere, especially to the SEC).
Just saying... the newB12 acquiring rivalries like BYU/UU, UA/ASU, CSU/UCB will be great additions to hosting TT/Baylor/OSU, TCU/UHou, KSU/KU/ISU, WVa/Cincy/UCF regional rivalries.
|
(
In response to this post by CSU98)
Posted: 07/08/2022 at 3:03PM